Skip to main content
· 8/4/2011

Ezeoke v. Tracy

Citations

  • 349 S.W.3d 679
  • 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 6044
  • 2011 WL 3359659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that sanctions order could not be upheld under trial court’s inherent authority because it did not include findings that sanctioned party’s conduct significantly interfered with court’s legitimate exercise of core functions
  • reversing sanctions against an attorney based on the trial court's inherent power where the complained-of-conduct did not interfere with the exercise of a core function
  • remanding for proceedings consistent with Chapter 10

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William J. Boyce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.