Skip to main content
· 4/17/2024

Ezeoha v. Association of Apartment Owners of Nihilani at Princeville Resort

Citations

  • 154 Haw. 95
  • 546 P.3d 648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the presumption of validity applies to reex- amined claims
  • remanding an appeal for clarification where the district court “fail[ed] to provide any findings or reasoning” supporting its conclusion that the case was not exceptional
  • \[I]nvalidation of the certificate of correction result[s] in [the] uncorrected claim . . . being restored.\
  • “This court has previously noted the propriety of independently considering the public notice function in interpreting the patent statutes.”
  • “ ‘[w]e also consider not only the bare meaning of the word[s] but also [their] placement and purpose in the statutory scheme’”
  • “No inquiry as to the subjective intent of the applicant or PTO is appropriate or even possible in the context of a patent infringement suit.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.