· 5/2/1990
Ezenwa v. State
Citations
- 572 A.2d 1101
- 82 Md. App. 489
- 1990 Md. App. LEXIS 67
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failing to entertain an issue regarding testimony that was objected to by codefendant, but not by the appellant
- failing to entertain an issue regarding testimony that was objected to by codefendant, but not by the appellant
- “Consistent with our view that conspiracy to distribute merges into conspiracy to import, we will vacate the former conviction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.