Skip to main content
· 3/8/1919

Ezell v. Butcher

Citations

  • 104 Kan. 465
  • 179 P. 332
  • 1919 Kan. LEXIS 290

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Sale — Original Promise to Pay for Goods Furnished Another. The evidence held sufficient to carry to the jury the question whether a promise to pay for goods furnished to another was original or collateral.</p>

Judges: Mason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.