Eyster v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employer engaging in several rounds of promoting employees based on an “allegedly tainted eligibility list” was not a “continuing act”
• a Title VII plaintiff must timely file a charge with the EEOC within 180 days after the alleged unlawful employment practice in order to file suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).