· 6/23/2006
Eye v. Eye
Citations
- 849 N.E.2d 698
- 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1209
- 2006 WL 1716861
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding trial court’s failure to mention certain evidence in its written findings does not mean that it did not consider it
- we review the trial court’s disposition of the marital estate as a whole, not item by item
- exclusion of factors from written findings is not a bar but reasoning must be inferable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robb, Vaidik, Mathias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.