Skip to main content
· 6/23/2006

Eye v. Eye

Citations

  • 849 N.E.2d 698
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1209
  • 2006 WL 1716861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court’s failure to mention certain evidence in its written findings does not mean that it did not consider it
  • we review the trial court’s disposition of the marital estate as a whole, not item by item
  • exclusion of factors from written findings is not a bar but reasoning must be inferable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Vaidik, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.