Skip to main content
· 1/11/1996

Eyal Lior v. Sit

Citations

  • 913 F. Supp. 868
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3739
  • 1996 WL 44560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiffs’ stipulation removing the nondiverse defendant triggered the thirty-day removal period under 28 U.S.C. § 1446 (b)
  • finding no diversity jurisdiction where the defendants’ submissions did not establish the location of their corporate headquarters at the time of removal
  • awarding costs and reasonable attorney fees where, among other defects, the amended notice of removal was filed thirty-four days after the removing defendants received a draft stipulation from the plaintiffs dismissing an allegedly nondiverse corporate defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lechner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.