Skip to main content
· 9/10/2013

Ey v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives

Citations

  • 967 F. Supp. 2d 337
  • 28 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 845
  • 2013 WL 4804485
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128655
  • 119 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he plaintiff’s own disagreement with his supervisors’ view is certainly not sufficient to establish pretext or discrimination.”
  • “[T]he plaintiff’s own disagreement with his supervisors’ view is certainly not sufficient to establish pretext or discrimination.”
  • “[T]he plaintiff’s own disagreement with his supervisors’ view is certainly not sufficient to establish pretext or discrimination.”
  • “[T]he plaintiff’s own disagree- ment with his supervisor’s view is certainly not sufficient to establish pretext . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Beryl A. Howell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.