EXZAVIER ROBINSON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that regulation was not impermissibly retroactive because it called for the \correct\ application of existing reimbursement principles, \not the application of any new reimbursement principles\
• concluding an agency decision to recalculate a base amount in a fixed reimbursement system to prevent the distortion of future reimbursements was reasonable
• explaining that a Cabinet Secretary’s failure to meet statutory deadline did “not mean that official lacked power to act beyond it”
• concluding an agency decision to recalculate a base amount in a fixed reimbursement system to prevent the distortion of future reimbursements was reasonable
• explaining that a Cabinet Secretary’s failure to meet statutory deadline did “not mean that official lacked power to act beyond it”
• noting that a court “must not be guided by a single sentence or member of a sentence, but [it must] look to the provisions of the whole law, and to its object and policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).