ExxonMobil Corp. v. Kirkendall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Employer must prove that it was a subscriber “at the time its employees sustained their injuries.”
• “[W]hile Mobil’s plan most likely violates an administrative rule, nothing in Texas law provides that this violation causes an employer to forfeit its subscriber status.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).