Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Gill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the substantive law must be taken into consideration in determining whether the purported class can meet the certification prerequisites under rule 42
• stating that the substantive law must be taken into consideration in determining whether the purported class can meet the certification prerequisites under rule 42
• stating that when a class has been certified based on a significant misunderstanding of the law, remand to the trial court is appropriate so that it may determine the effect on the requirements for class certification
• stating that when a class has been certified based on a significant misunderstanding of the law, remand to the trial court is appropriate so that it may determine the effect on the requirements for class certification
• stating that when a class has been certified based on a significant misunderstanding of the law, remand to the trial court is appropriate so that it may determine the effect on the requirements for class certification
• explaining, in holding that trial court misapplied case law, that trial court acknowledged and distinguished case law that was, in fact, indistinguishable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).