Skip to main content
· 7/7/2009

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Citations

  • 571 F.3d 1208
  • 387 U.S. App. D.C. 125
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14947
  • 2009 WL 1930170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining refund calculation methodology, which does not include retro- actively resetting rates for all market participants
  • “Section 206(a) provides the only mechanism by which FERC can revise established rates.”
  • declining to consider standing theory first articulated at oral argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Griffith, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.