Exxon Corp. v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an agreement that one company had a right to control an employee “is a factor to be considered” in determining the identity of the employee’s statutory employer under the Workers’ Compensation Act
• holding court of appeals erred by holding that contract was conclusive and remanding case to the trial court for a new trial
• reversing for failure to submit jury issue on borrowed servant even in the face of conflicting contract
• stating same in context of borrowed servant doctrine
• addressing right-to-control test in workers’ compensation context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).