Exxon Corp. v. Fulgham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• injured party with 50% permanent disability entitled to jury instruction on lost earning capacity despite increase in salary by time of trial
• injured party with 50% permanent disability entitled to jury instruction on lost earning capacity despite increase in salary by time of trial
• lessening of future earning capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Boyd v. Bulala
  W.D. Virginia· 1986-11-05· cited 42×
• Clark v. Chapman
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1989-11-10· cited 20×
• Power v. Arlington Hospital
  E.D. Virginia· 1992-08-28· cited 19×
• Bailey v. Henderson
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1990-06-08· cited 1×
• Wood v. Tinsley & Western Express Co.
  Spotsylvania County Circuit Court· 1987-07-27
• Julias v. Moyers
  Rockingham County Circuit Court· 1998-01-05

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Beasley v. Bosschermuller
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1965-09-10· cited 27×
• Oak Knolls Realty Corp. v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1971-11-29· cited 21×
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Futrell
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1968-09-06· cited 21×
• Aivaliotis v. S.S. Atlantic Glory
  E.D. Virginia· 1963-02-21· cited 5×
• Basham v. Pate
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1972-04-24· cited 2×