Exxon Corp. v. Enstar Engineering Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding an expert’s “after-the-fact opinion that” a speaker’s statements about the plaintiff were unfounded “does not establish that Defendants ‘in fact entertained serious doubts’ as to the truth of any of their statements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).