Exxon Corp. v. Breezevale Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because Breezevale was awarded $1 million on its contract law claim, it had an adequate remedy as a matter of law, and, thus, could not assert the partial-performance exception
• holding that we may affirm directed verdict on any ground that supports it
• concluding parol contract was unenforceable where partial performance consisted of services that could have been performed pursuant to a different contract
• holding evidence was legally insufficient to support jury's finding of partial performance of alleged agreement because the conduct in question could have been related to services performed under another contract
• holding evidence was legally insufficient to support jury’s finding of partial performance of alleged agreement because the conduct in question could have been related to services performed under other contract
• stating that a contract for the transfer or assignment of an interest in an oil and gas lease is a real property interest subject to the statute of frauds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).