Exxon Co., U.S.A. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he rule against retroactive ratemaking ... does not extend to cases in which [customers] are on adequate notice that resolution of some specific issue may cause a later adjustment to the rate being collected at the time of service” (alteration and omission in original
• “[W]e did not remand because the old method was inaccurate, but because it was unfairly nonuniform.”
• issuing the rulings that in the end required such refunds
• issuing the rulings that in the end required such refunds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).