Skip to main content
· 7/30/2002

Exxon Chemicals America v. Chao

Citations

  • 298 F.3d 464
  • 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20004
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15282
  • 2002 WL 1541999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[T]he ARB's remand order did not constitute a final agency action\ because it did not resolve the merits of the underlying case and it did not have a \substantial effect\ on the rights of the parties.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Benavides, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.