Skip to main content
· 10/31/2011

Exum v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 821 F. Supp. 2d 1285
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125930
  • 2011 WL 5155827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that defendants presented sufficient evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000 where defendants presented plaintiff’s deposition testimony stating he lost between $150,000 to $200,000 as a result of defendant’s failure to pay his insurance claim
  • finding “[t]he Lowery case appears to have elaborated a different and more rigorous burden than the preponderance of the evidence burden . . ..”
  • suggesting preponderance-of-the-evidence standard applies to substantive jurisdictional inquiry, while unambiguously-establish standard applies when considering procedural propriety of second paragraph removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mark E. Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.