Express Valet, Inc. v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding forfeiture of “[a]n issue not clearly defined and sufficiently presented” under Rule 341(h)
• an issue not clearly defined and sufficiently presented fails to satisfy the requirements of Rule 341(h)(7) and is, therefore, waived
• “concerns over the imprecise nature of punitive damages are not present in this case ... [t]he penalties imposed on petitioners in this case were statutorily created and clearly provide notice of the range of fines that could be imposed for violations of the Code.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).