U.S. Customs Court· 5/8/1968
Express Forwarding & Storage Co. v. United States
Citations
- 60 Cust. Ct. 511
- 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- marble statue imported for “utilitarian advertising”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bao, Ford, Rao
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Benziger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1904-01-04· cited 50×
- Daprato Statuary Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1928-06-11· cited 12×
- Hogue v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1926-02-25· cited 7×
- Gasparri Studios v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1954-12-21· cited 7×
- John Horvath Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1967-10-26· cited 6×
- Stevason v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1954-04-29· cited 4×
- Ross Products, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1959-10-16· cited 2×
- Castelazo & Associates v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1965-06-14· cited 2×
Other cases named Express Forwarding & Storage Co. v. United States
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Express Forwarding & Storage Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1959-03-20
- Express Forwarding & Storage Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1960-03-17
- Express Forwarding & Storage Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1962-10-11
- Express Forwarding & Storage Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1967-01-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.