Export-Import Bank of United States v. Asia Pulp & Paper Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the FDCPA “creates no property rights but merely attaches consequences, federally defined, to rights created under state law”
• finding that judgment debtor did not have “substantial interest” in midstream EFT
• consulting post -enactment commentary by the ULC's Permanent Editorial Board for the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in interpreting a particular UCC provision
• extending the Drye analysis from the federal tax lien statute to the FDCPA context
• “[W]e express no opinion about whether the [IEEPA] and its accompanying regulations ... supersede state law governing substantive property rights.”
• Article 4-A was “enacted to provide a comprehensive body of law that defines the rights and obligations that arise from wire transfers” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).