Exponential Biotherapies, Inc. v. Houthoff Buruma N.V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]elephone calls, emails, facsimiles and mailings, 28 including invoices . . . are insufficient to subject [defendant] to this Court’s personal jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).