· 11/15/2001
Explore Info. Servs. v. COURT INFO. SYS
Citations
- 636 N.W.2d 50
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a rule 1.904(2) motion cannot be used simply to rehash legal issues already previously decided by the court
- noting post-trial motions are not appropriately used to “rehash legal issues raised . . . and decided adversely”
- noting we must “dismiss a case not meeting [appellate] deadlines even if the parties do not raise the issue”
- stating the “rule is mandatory and jurisdictional” and requires appellate courts “to dismiss a case not meeting these deadlines even if the parties do not raise the issue”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lavorato
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.