Skip to main content
· 11/15/2001

Explore Info. Servs. v. COURT INFO. SYS

Citations

  • 636 N.W.2d 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a rule 1.904(2) motion cannot be used simply to rehash legal issues already previously decided by the court
  • noting post-trial motions are not appropriately used to “rehash legal issues raised . . . and decided adversely”
  • noting we must “dismiss a case not meeting [appellate] deadlines even if the parties do not raise the issue”
  • stating the “rule is mandatory and jurisdictional” and requires appellate courts “to dismiss a case not meeting these deadlines even if the parties do not raise the issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavorato

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.