· 1/16/1961
Exner v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America
Citations
- 402 Pa. 473
- 167 A.2d 703
- 1961 Pa. LEXIS 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that for purposes of an omnibus clause in an automobile policy, permission given to a driver by the insured may be either express or implied
- holding that for purposes of an omnibus clause in an automobile policy, permission given to a driver by the insured may be either express or implied
- determining that when a plaintiff proves ownership of an automobile by one party and its operation by a second party, there is a A-2236-18T3 11 presumption the owner has granted permission to the operator that may be overcome by evidence rebutting the presumption
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Bell, Musmanno, Cohen, Bok, Eagen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.