Skip to main content
· 1/16/1961

Exner v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America

Citations

  • 402 Pa. 473
  • 167 A.2d 703
  • 1961 Pa. LEXIS 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that for purposes of an omnibus clause in an automobile policy, permission given to a driver by the insured may be either express or implied
  • holding that for purposes of an omnibus clause in an automobile policy, permission given to a driver by the insured may be either express or implied
  • determining that when a plaintiff proves ownership of an automobile by one party and its operation by a second party, there is a A-2236-18T3 11 presumption the owner has granted permission to the operator that may be overcome by evidence rebutting the presumption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Bell, Musmanno, Cohen, Bok, Eagen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.