Skip to main content
· 1/3/1910

Exler v. American Box Co.

Citations

  • 226 Pa. 384
  • 75 A. 661
  • 1910 Pa. LEXIS 779

Syllabus

<p>Bankruptcy — Illegal preference — Judgment—Striking off judgment — • Jurisdiction — Practice, C. P.</p> <p>1. In a proceeding to strike off the lien of a judgment as an unlawful preference, state and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction under the bankruptcy act, but when relief is sought in a state court and its jurisdiction is exercised, the rules of practice as established in the courts of that state prevail.</p> <p>2. The court of common pleas has no power to strike off a judgment or to strike off the lien of the judgment against real estate, because the judgment was entered within four months of the bankruptcy of the defendant, and at a time when the defendant is alleged to have been insolvent, when the fact of insolvency is denied. The court may, however, open the judgment so that a jury may pass upon the question of the insolvency of the defendant on the day that the judgment was entered.</p> <p>3. It is only when the fact upon which the court is asked to strike off a judgment regular on its face, is admitted or not questioned that it may be stricken off.</p> <p>4. An order declaring the lien of a judgment void and the real estate of the defendant not bound by it is in effect an order striking off the judgment.</p>

Judges: Brown, Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.