Exito Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Trejo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defect in proof means trial court could properly deny special appearance, but it is not a waiver issue
• holding that party did not waive special appearance by failing to properly verify special appearance; any defects in proof of special appearance go to merits rather than waiving ability to challenge jurisdiction
• holding that Rule 11 agreement signed by defendant’s attorney agreeing that defendant would have additional time to respond to motion did not waive special appearance because it did not seek affirmative action by trial court
• noting that it is illogical not to allow specially appearing defendant to seek trial court’s ruling on dispute that may affect evidence presented at special appearance hearing
• noting that, in addition to corporate officer’s affidavit, record also contained pleadings and deposition of Exito’s corporate representative
• noting that Rule 11 agreement in that case \merely acknowledges that [the defendant] is required to respond to the petition in some manner\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).