Skip to main content
· 2/23/1994

Exira Community School District v. State

Citations

  • 512 N.W.2d 787
  • 1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 38
  • 1994 WL 54082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • mentioning an argument based on the great public importance exception to standing, but not considering it
  • stating it is unnecessary for the court to consider the great-public-importance doctrine because the general rules of standing apply
  • stating: “The well-settled rule in Iowa is that school districts, as political subdivisions of the state, lack standing to mount a constitutional attack against a state statute.”
  • “We usually deem the federal and state Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses to be identical in scope and purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson, Carter, Lavorato, Neuman, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.