Skip to main content
· 9/30/2009

Executone of Columbus, Inc. v. Inter-Tel, Inc.

Citations

  • 665 F. Supp. 2d 899
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91660
  • 2009 WL 3210354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that promissory estoppel claims are subject to 6-year statute of limitations
  • stating that “[b]orrowing statutes are part of the procedural law of the forum state”
  • “The determination of whether a party has established the reliance element of a promissory estoppel claim is generally a question of fact for a jury to resolve.”
  • Ohio law does not support a promissory estoppel claim overlapping with a breach of contract claim where the same payment obligation is the gravamen of the breach of contract claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George C. Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.