Executive Towers v. Leonard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if parties attempt to modify contract, and the attempt is ineffective under the Arizona Statute of Frauds, then the original contract is not rescinded and remains,in effect
• “[W]here an original 18 agreement comes within provisions of the statute of frauds requiring certain agreements to 19 be in writing, the statute of frauds renders invalid and ineffectual a subsequent oral 20 agreement changing the terms of the written contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).