EXDS, Inc. v. RK Electric, Inc. (In Re EXDS, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Travellers Int’l AG and stating that the claimant had “lost its right to a jury trial because it elected to participate in the equity court proceeding”
• creditor’s proof of claim subjected the creditor’s disputes to the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction even if creditor later withdrew the proof of claim
• creditor’s proof of claim subjected the creditor’s disputes to the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction even if creditor later withdrew the proof of claim
• creditor’s proof of claim subjected the creditor’s disputes to the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction even if creditor later withdrew the proof of claim
• creditor’s proof of claim subjected the creditor’s disputes to the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction even if creditor later withdrew the proof of claim
• “Given the unequivocal language of Langenkamp and Travellers as to the effect of filing a proof of claim, I do not believe that a creditor can, for strategic reasons, reverse the result it triggered by filing a proof of claim by later withdrawing the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).