Exchange National Bank v. DeGraff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff had not waived review of the trial coprt’s admission of evidence because it had made a motion in limine to exclude that evidence
• noting that Rule 219(b) requires the matters sought by the requests to be of substantial importance, and finding that, in that case, plaintiffs denial of certain requests did not warrant imposition of costs and fees because those requests “lack[ed] substantial importance”
• noting that Rule 219(b) -54- 1-05-3686 requires the matters sought by the requests to be of substantial importance, and finding that, in that case, plaintiff’s denial of certain requests did not warrant imposition of costs and fees because those requests “lack[ed] substantial importance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).