· 10/12/1976
Exchange Nat. Bank of Colo. Springs v. Sparkman
Citations
- 554 P.2d 1090
- 191 Colo. 534
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the burden of proof does not shift, even after a prima facie case has been established
- parol evidence of subsequent conduct is admissible to show a modification of a written trust agreement
- parol evidence of subsequent conduct is admissible to show a modification of a written trust agreement
- settlor’s delivery of unendorsed stock certificates with blank assignment was sufficient to transfer certificates to trust corpus
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Erickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.