Skip to main content
· 10/12/1976

Exchange Nat. Bank of Colo. Springs v. Sparkman

Citations

  • 554 P.2d 1090
  • 191 Colo. 534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the burden of proof does not shift, even after a prima facie case has been established
  • parol evidence of subsequent conduct is admissible to show a modification of a written trust agreement
  • parol evidence of subsequent conduct is admissible to show a modification of a written trust agreement
  • settlor’s delivery of unendorsed stock certificates with blank assignment was sufficient to transfer certificates to trust corpus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.