Skip to main content
· 7/2/1979

Excello Wine Co. v. Monsieur Henri Wines, Ltd.

Citations

  • 474 F. Supp. 203
  • 15 Ohio Op. 3d 458
  • 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that issue of whether \good faith\ and \just cause\ standards were coterminous was \academic\ where franchisor satisfied both standards in terminating franchise
  • holding plaintiff would not necessarily suffer irreparable harm in part because customers would not seek wine based on supplier
  • indicating that plaintiff, whose wine distributorship was being terminated, could not show irreparable harm, sufficient to support the granting preliminary injunction, since plaintiff could be compensated with monetary damages
  • expressing skepticism that any franchise termination would impair any relationships with retailers
  • expressing skepticism that any franchise termination would impair any relationships with retailers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kinneary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.