· 7/2/1979
Excello Wine Co. v. Monsieur Henri Wines, Ltd.
Citations
- 474 F. Supp. 203
- 15 Ohio Op. 3d 458
- 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that issue of whether \good faith\ and \just cause\ standards were coterminous was \academic\ where franchisor satisfied both standards in terminating franchise
- holding plaintiff would not necessarily suffer irreparable harm in part because customers would not seek wine based on supplier
- indicating that plaintiff, whose wine distributorship was being terminated, could not show irreparable harm, sufficient to support the granting preliminary injunction, since plaintiff could be compensated with monetary damages
- expressing skepticism that any franchise termination would impair any relationships with retailers
- expressing skepticism that any franchise termination would impair any relationships with retailers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kinneary
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.