Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/23/1955
Excellent Laundry Co. v. Szekeres
Citations
- 382 Pa. 23
- 114 A.2d 176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- law is not concerned with matters that have become moot, and the court will act only where a real controversy exists
- law is not concerned with matters that have become moot, and the court will act only where a real controversy exists
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Chidsey, Jones, Stearns, Stern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sweeney v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-07-08· cited 168×
- Sgarlat v. Kingston Borough Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-05-07· cited 15×
- Pennsylvania State Police v. PaulshockCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-11-20· cited 12×
- Robbins v. KristoficSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-05· cited 10×
- Fox v. Central Delaware County AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-23· cited 7×
- Taylor v. Borough Council Emmaus BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-19· cited 1×
- Youngstown Industrial & Development Corporation v. Hillcrest Shopping CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-07-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.