Skip to main content
· 9/16/1992

Ex Parte Winton

Citations

  • 837 S.W.2d 134
  • 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 170
  • 1992 WL 222182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the right to self-representation does not attach until it is clearly and unequivocally asserted
  • holding that the right to self-representation does not attach until it is clearly and unequivocally asserted
  • stating that the “right [of self-representation] must be asserted in a timely manner, namely, before the jury is impaneled”
  • stating that the “right [of self- representation] must be asserted in a timely manner, namely, before the jury is impaneled”
  • explaining that a defendant “should be allowed to so proceed so long as the assertion of his right to self-representation is unconditional”
  • explaining that a defendant A should be allowed to so proceed so long as the assertion of his right to self‑representation is unconditional @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.