Ex parte Williams' Administrator

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing defamation 23 claim at pleadings stage because, among other things, “the bases for Chanos’s opinions were not 24 entirely undisclosed”
• declining to address merits of defendant's anti-SLAPP motion because complaint was dismissed with leave to amend, but permitting defendant to re-raise the motion after time for pleadings passed or if he otherwise \prevail[ed]\
• dismissing defamation under Rule 12(b)(6) due to failure to claim actual malice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).