Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/21/1990
Ex Parte Williams
Citations
- 799 S.W.2d 304
- 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 185
- 1990 WL 180806
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- it is well established that a contempt conviction is “criminal” if it punishes for past violations, and “civil” if it attempts to coerce future action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Teague, Berchelmann, Sturns
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte RhodesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-01· cited 65×
- State v. PassmoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 47×
- United States v. DixonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-31· cited 21×
- Ex Parte BuiTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1998-11-20· cited 20×
- Ivey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-11-09· cited 13×
- Joshua Luttrell, Andrew Davis, Moises Roman, Joe Rodriguez And on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. El Paso CountyTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2018-07-26· cited 11×
- Ex Parte JacksonTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1995-11-22· cited 9×
- Ex Parte JonesTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2000-12-21· cited 7×
- State v. RhodesTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-02-20· cited 4×
- State of Texas v. Katherine Sue JacksonTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2002-04-25· cited 2×
- Raul Cid v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-06-21
- Ex Parte Eddie Thomas ChapaTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2018-05-23
- Ex Parte Eddie Thomas ChapaTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2018-08-22
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 1,084×
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 1,036×
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 861×
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-03-30· cited 835×
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 815×
- Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 659×
- Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 631×
- In Re ChapmanSupreme Court· 1897-04-19· cited 231×
- Jurney v. MacCrackenSupreme Court· 1935-02-04· cited 83×
- State v. SammonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1982-05-24· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-21· cited 63×
- People v. TottenIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 54×
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 53×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.