Ex Parte Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is clear from these cases that there is presently a trend in the law to allow expert testimony on the subject of human memory.”
• \It is clear from these cases that there is presently a trend in the law to allow expert testimony on the subject of human memory.\
• “It is clear from these cases that there is presently a trend in the law to allow expert testimony on the subject of human memory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Walker
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-05-28· cited 191×
• McMullen v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-04-09· cited 51×
• Curtis Giovanni Flowers v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2014-11-13· cited 42×
• Revis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-01-13· cited 31×
• Bomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-01-15· cited 18×
• Bowden v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-09-18· cited 7×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. John W. Downing
  Third Circuit· 1985-01-25· cited 627×
• People v. McDonald
  California Supreme Court· 1984-11-21· cited 436×
• United States v. Michael R. Moore, Larry P. Moore and Beverly K. Moore
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-04-16· cited 98×
• Hulcher v. Taunton
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1980-09-26· cited 34×
• United States v. Victor Alexander
  Fifth Circuit· 1987-04-22· cited 29×
• Hancock v. City of Montgomery
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1983-02-25· cited 16×
• Rannells v. Graham
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1983-08-26· cited 3×