Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/19/2003
Ex Parte Wheeler
Citations
- 122 S.W.3d 170
- 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 844
- 2003 WL 22717681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying de novo review after finding no testimony on the merits was given at the habeas hearing and that the judge who heard the petition did not preside over appellant’s trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte WheelerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-10-04· cited 442×
- Ex Parte: Francisco CarbajalTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2004-08-05
- Wheeler, Ex Parte Kristin HopeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-10-04
- Gerardo Reyes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2013-01-25
- Charles Scott Patterson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2013-01-25
- Ex Parte MacK WatsonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2020-12-22
- Robert F. Hallman v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2022-06-16
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.