Skip to main content

Ex Parte Weems

Citations

  • 711 So. 2d 1011
  • 1998 WL 164835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • civil and criminal proceedings held to be not actually parallel
  • civil and criminal proceedings held to be not actually parallel
  • Court denied a writ of mandamus, holding that pending criminal and civil actions were not parallel proceedings and, thus, that a stay of discovery in the civil action was not necessary to protect the petitioner's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination
  • civil and criminal proceedings held to be not actually parallel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.