Ex Parte Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \From the facts and circumstances of the case it is our conclusion that there was evidence from which the jury could have reasonably inferred that the appellant knew that the parcel contained a narcotic\
• after remand from Alabama Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Donahoo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-10-14· cited 132×
• Ex Parte Harper
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-09-27· cited 57×
• Lockhart v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-11-14· cited 48×
• Donahoo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-09-29· cited 31×
• McGruder v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-12-01· cited 28×
• Korreckt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-05-12· cited 25×
• Bright v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-12-01· cited 20×
• Gary v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-03-26· cited 18×
• Levett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-08-23· cited 15×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-06-24· cited 7×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-05-03· cited 2×
• Sherman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-02-25
• Coder v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-11-24