Ex parte Tyler
Citations
- 107 Cal. 78
- 40 P. 33
- 1895 Cal. LEXIS 713
Syllabus
<p>Attorney at Law—Violation of Duty—Disbarment—Res Ad jodio ata. A judgment of the supreme court that an attorney has been guilty of a violation of his duty as attorney and counselor, and of his oath of office as such, is a judicial determination of that fact, by reason of which the court is estopped from subsequently investigating the sufficiency or legal effect of the proofs to establish the charge; and a subsequent denial of a motion to modify the judgment is also a conclusive determination that the court did not exceed its authority in rendering the judgment.</p> <p>Id.—Relation of Offense to Office of Attorney—Previous Conviction, When and When not Necessary—Power of Court—Discretion.—When an attorney has violated the laws of the state in a matter distinct from his professional conduct, and not by virtue of his office as an attorney, courts will not entertain any proceedings for his disbarment until after he has been convicted of the offense charged; but when he is charged with violation of his professional obligations, either to his client or to the court, it is no defense to a proceeding for his suspension or disbarment that the same transactions may render him liable to a criminal prosecution, and the court has power to strike his name from the roll of attorneys, and this power is not suspended until after his previous conviction of crime, although the court may in its discretion withhold the exercise of the power, as the facts of any particular case may suggest would be appropriate.</p> <p>Id.—Construction of Code.—Under subdivision 1 of section 287 of the Code of Civil Procedure the conviction of an attorney of felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude is ground for his disbarment, whether such offense was committed in his private capacity or by virtue of his professional relation; but there is no limitation upon the power of the court for the removal or suspension of an attorney who has been guilty of any violation of the oath taken by him, or of h
Cited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- The Florida Bar v. McCainSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-06-15· cited 32×
- Williford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1937-11-26· cited 17×
- Hartman v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1937-03-31· cited 10×
- Maggart v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-12-17· cited 10×
- In re WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-09-23· cited 10×
- State Medical Examining Board v. StewartWashington Supreme Court· 1907-03-26· cited 9×
- In Re the Discipline of TornowSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-08-07· cited 3×
- In re TiptonIdaho Supreme Court· 1895-11-26· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. McCormick v. WintonOregon Supreme Court· 1884-10-15· cited 19×
- In re TylerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-12-03· cited 17×
- In re TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1885-08-22· cited 8×
- In re TildenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-01-19· cited 7×
- In re WyattCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-04-24· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.