Skip to main content
· 2/21/2003

Ex Parte Troutman Sanders, LLP

Citations

  • 866 So. 2d 547
  • 2003 WL 377851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a motion to alter or amend \may be made only in reference to a final judgment or order\ (internal quotation omitted)
  • stating that a motion to alter or amend “may be made only in reference to a final judgment or order” (internal quotation omitted)
  • explaining that motions seeking reconsideration of interlocutory orders do not toll the time for filing a petition for the writ of mandamus
  • stating that a motion to alter or amend \may be made only in reference to a final judgment or order\ (internal quotation omitted)
  • explaining that motions seeking reconsideration of interlocutory orders do not toll the time for filing a petition for the writ of mandamus
  • clarifying that Rule 59, Ala. R. Civ. P., does not apply to interlocutory orders such as orders denying motions to dismiss and does not toll the time for seeking appellate relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.