Ex parte T.J.R.-L. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: T.J.R.-L. v. B.M.) (Randolph Circuit Court: JU-23-15.02; Civil Appeals: CL-2024-0659).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plaintiff was entitled to enforce the 308 Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Hinkle note because it possessed the note, indorsed in blank, “at the time that the complaint was filed”
• distinguishing, in a wrongful death action against mental-health providers following decedent’s suicide, cer- tain custodial circumstances in which a care provider has assumed an affirmative duty of self-care for a patient or inmate
• “For restitution purposes, the defendant’s criminal activity must be the reasonably foreseeable but for cause of the victim’s losses.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• “Because we must remand for resentencing to correct [one] error, we do not reach defendant’s assignment regarding [another sentencing error], which the trial court will have an opportunity to address in the first instance on remand.”
• “Because we must remand for resentenc- ing to correct [one] error, we do not reach defendant’s assign- ment regarding [a sentencing error], which the trial court will have an opportunity to address in the first instance on remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).