Ex Parte Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Rule 32 petition asserting a claim of improper enhancement under the HFOA was not meritorious because such an issue is properly raised on direct appeal, rather than in a Rule 32 petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nichols v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-11-19· cited 36×
• Nicastro v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-07-24· cited 7×
• Robinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-08-06· cited 5×
• Franks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-06-29· cited 3×
• Winstead v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-09-29· cited 1×
• Fowler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-10-26

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Clemmons v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1975-05-22· cited 91×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-05-03· cited 40×
• Ex Parte Lockett
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1989-07-28· cited 25×
• Robinson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-03-29· cited 12×
• Clemmons v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1974-10-01· cited 10×