Skip to main content

Ex Parte Stewart

Citations

  • 730 So. 2d 1246
  • 1999 WL 7024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 12-16-9 overrode the conflicting portions of Rule 19.3 and eliminated the need for an agreement to separate the jury in capital cases
  • holding that the Legislature implicitly repealed the provisions of Rule 19.3, Ala.R.Crim.P., relating to jury sequestration
  • describing repeal by implication as `an accepted legislative tool'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.