Ex parte State v. In re Blanding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering disclosure of work product material where non-disclosure would deprive Plaintiff of important impeachment material and relevant substantive information
• “where contemporaneous statements have been made that cannot be reproduced, courts will often order the production of work product”
• investigatory materials were “unduplicatable” because they were made when facts and circumstances were fresh in the minds of those interviewed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).