Skip to main content
· 12/15/1833

Ex parte Squires v. Broome C .P.

Citations

  • 10 Wend. 600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the litigation privilege barred the breach of contract claim in part because “the agreement on which plaintiff relies does not clearly prohibit the conduct that plaintiff challenges”
  • holding that, given the 19 important public interest favoring reports to law enforcement, statements not “clearly 20 prohibit[ed]” by a contract remained privileged
  • communication made during investigation of potential police misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.