Ex parte Smith
Citations
- 53 Cal. 204
- 1878 Cal. LEXIS 111
Syllabus
<p>Contempt of Court.—The provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure relative to contempt of Court and punishment therefor are as applicable to the Probate Court as to the District Court.</p> <p>Disobedience of an Order of Final Distribution of an estate is contempt of Court within the meaning of sec. 1203 of the Code.</p> <p>Office of the Writ of Certiorari en Reviewing Proceedings for Contempt.—Where the Probate Court has jurisdiction, its judgment upon the issues in proceedings for contempt is final, and a review under a writ of certiorari only extends to the question whether the Court regularly pursued its authority.</p> <p>Settlement of an Estate not an Action.—The proceedings for the settlement of an estate are not a civil action within the meaning of see. 15 of art. 1 of the Constitution.</p> <p>Executor a Trustee.—Money in the hands of an executor is held by him in trust, not as a debt.</p> <p>Executor Subject to Attachment for Contempt.—As a trustee for the heirs and creditors, and as an officer of the Court, an executor is subject to attachment for contempt.</p>
Cited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wiggin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-01-27· cited 50×
- Carpenter v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court· 1888-04-21· cited 43×
- Clary v. ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-04-06· cited 41×
- O'Donnell v. SlackCalifornia Supreme Court· 1899-01-13· cited 35×
- Dow v. LillieNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1914-01-08· cited 35×
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. LindholmNinth Circuit· 1933-06-12· cited 27×
- Wheeler v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 23×
- In re the Estate of WittmeierCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-09-13· cited 18×
- State ex rel. Eakins v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court· 1906-05-14· cited 18×
- Wilson v. MartinezWyoming Supreme Court· 1956-09-24· cited 15×
- In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-10-26· cited 15×
- State v. MarkusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1895-10-28· cited 11×
- Rafferty v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-02-11· cited 10×
- Ex parte CohnCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 10×
- Sayers v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-07-05· cited 10×
- In re TaberSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1900-03-29· cited 10×
- Guardianship of MohlenhauerCalifornia Superior Court, San Francisco County· 1878-03-20
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.